LLMs at 0xide. By Bryan Cantrill
Article : 576 - Using LLMs at Oxide / RFD / Oxide
576 - Using LLMs at Oxide / RFD / Oxide
Using LLMs at Oxide | Hacker News
LLMs at 0xide. By Bryan Cantrill
Article : 576 - Using LLMs at Oxide / RFD / Oxide
576 - Using LLMs at Oxide / RFD / Oxide
Using LLMs at Oxide | Hacker News
No mention of C# - yet.
No way they will replace C# - most of Azure runs on it.
C# is also 1000% safer than C - yes you can do some silly things with it, but idiomatic C# is pretty safe (much safer than Delphi) - since you don’t play with pointers - and the tooling provides a lot of help with avoiding potential oopsies.
Not getting excited about anything windows these days - the enshitified version of windows that they are slowly shoving down our throats is turning me more towards MacOS and Linux already.
Not so:
Microsoft Distinguished Engineer Galen Hunt posted about his ambitious goal on LinkedIn four days ago, provoking a wave of excitement and concern.
Now he’s been forced to clarify: “My team’s project is a research project. We are building tech to make migration from language to language possible,” he wrote in an update to his LinkedIn post. His intent, he said, was to find like-minded engineers, “not to set a new strategy for Windows 11+ or to imply that Rust is an endpoint.”
Research only. Likely to not go as planned IMHO. You do research to see if things ARE as you THINK. Most research shows otherwise…
I might add that it’s typical of people blowing their own trumpet on LinkedIn. You don’t have to back up an aspirational post with any real-world results. If it fails it will never be mentioned again…